Jurisdiction of Electronic Transaction in Thailand
Songsil Norintorongkul Na Ayudhaya*
As we can see from Section 4 (1) of this Act, there are two principles to establish personal jurisdiction
in Thai Court, the first principle is the case that if the defendant
is domiciled in the territory of Thailand regardless of whether the
defendant has Thai nationality or other nationalities, the defendant
can be subjected to Thai jurisdiction. The second principle is the case
that if the cause of action arises in the territory of Thailand, the
defendant can be sued in the Thai court regardless of whether the defendant
has domicile within Thailand or not. In practice, the plaintiff can
choose to file the lawsuit either at the court where defendant is domicile
or the court where the cause of action arises. In addition, the Civil
Procedure Code B.E.2477 (1934) describes further how to determine the
domicile of the defendant in Section 3 (2).
The Section provides that
"in case of the defendant is not domiciled within the Kingdom,
(a) if the defendant is ever domiciled at any place
of the Kingdom within the prescription of two years before the date
of submitting the plaint, it shall be deemed that such place is domicile
of the defendant,
(b) if the defendant carries on or ever carried on
the whole or some part of transaction within the Kingdom, irrespective
of himself or agent or by having any person for being in continuance
with such transaction within the Kingdom, it shall be deemed that
the place used or ever used to carry on such transaction or continuance,
or the place which is residence of the agent or continuous person
in the date of submitting the plaint or before such prescription of
two years, is domicile of the defendant."(15)
According to this provision, The Act prescribes the criteria to define
the defendant's domicile even though the defendant is not domiciled
in Thai jurisdiction at the time the plaintiff files the lawsuit. The
place is considered to be the domicile of the defendant depending on
two criteria in paragraph (a) and (b). First, under Section
3 (2) (a),
It is clear that Thai law prescribes two year timeframe for the defendants
liability if the defendant had domicile in Thailand before the defendant
left Thailand. Thus, the defendant can be sued in the Thai Court if
the defendant left Thailand less than two years from the date of submitting
the plaint. Secondly, according to Section 3 (2) (b), There needs to be a
connection between the defendant and Thailand that is, if the defendant
used to carry on business in the territory of Thailand or had the representative
in doing business in Thailand. The place considered to be the domicile
of the defendant is the place where the defendant used to carry on business
or the place which is residence of the representative of the defendant
within the prescription of two years from the date of submitting the
plaint.
Moreover, in the case that the defendant is not domiciled within Thai
jurisdiction, according to the Civil Procedure Code B.E.2477 (1934)
Section 3 (2) and
4(1) and the cause
of action does not arise in the territory of Thailand. The Civil Procedure
Code B.E.2477 (1934) provides principle of jurisdiction over the defendant
if the plaintiff has Thai nationality or domicile in Thailand in Section
4 ter. This Section provides that
"the other plaint as provided other than the
Section 4 bis (16),
which the defendant is not domiciled within the Kingdom and the cause
of action did not arise within the Kingdom, if the plaintiff has Thai
nationality or domicile within the Kingdom, it shall be submitted to
the Civil Court or to the Court within the territorial jurisdiction
of which the plaintiff is domiciled"
|