As we can see from this Section, Thai law establishes statutory principles
of "Extended jurisdiction" or "Long-arm jurisdiction"
to deal with the case where the defendant is not domiciled within Thai
jurisdiction and the cause of action did not arise in the territory
of Thailand. Section 4 ter mainly focuses on connections between the
plaintiff and the territory of Thailand rather than connections between
the defendant and the jurisdiction. However, in practice, the Thai Court
is reluctant to apply this Section except in the case that the plaintiff
can primarily show a connection to the defendant or defendant's act
causing damage to the plaintiff.
With respect to electronic transaction, principles of jurisdiction
mentioned above can be applied to any electronic transaction that has
connection to Thai personal jurisdiction.
There is no problem in the implementation of jurisdiction over the
defendant concerning the defendant's nationality because it is clear
that no matter where the defendant resides, the defendant still has
nationality to be subjected to personal jurisdiction. Therefore, if
the defendant has Thai nationality and breaches the contractual agreement,
which uses electronic means such as sale of products over the internet
website, the defendant can be sued in the Thai Court regardless of where
the defendant resides
In the case that the defendant does not hold Thai nationality and resides
outside Thailand, the Civil Procedure Code B.E.2477 (1934) Section 4 (1) provides principle
of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, if the cause of action
arises within Thai jurisdiction. However, in order to determine where
the cause of action arises for electronic transaction, we need to consider
the place where the electronic transaction is made. Under Thai Contract
Law, the contract is made when the acceptance is received by a person
who makes the offer and the place where the contract is made is the
place of residence or business of the person who makes the offer and
where the acceptance
is received.(17)
In addition, the issue to determine the place where the contract is
made can be explained in Section 24 of the Electronic Transaction Act
B.E.2544 (2001) which provides that