Baan Nua children also needed help that was culturally sensitive and that
celebrated their resilience and their loyalty to their families. One of the
strongest impressions of these children that I took away from my field
research was their remarkable strength. Acknowledging this did not lead me
to condone prostitution in any way or excuse their clients' manipulation and
abuse; instead, it warned me against destroying these children's own pride
and strategic involvement in their families' survival by recasting them as
helpless and pathetic.
VI. CONCLUSION
Unfortunately, all the new laws and initiatives came too late for the
children of Baan Nua. A week before I left the field, the first confirmed
AIDS-related death shocked an already vulnerable community and it
quickly disbanded. Some families traveled to Bangkok while others
returned to rural communities, continuing to sell sex to foreigners while
they still could. Neither foreign laws nor initiatives of extraterritoriality, nor
local laws on child protection would have made much impact on their lives.
The children and their families had no interest in seeing their clients
prosecuted or even stopped from entering Baan Nua. In the absence of any
social support or welfare assistance, these men were the only form of
protection the community had-no matter how damaging that might seem
to outsiders. The people of Baan Nua would never testify against these "friends."
Secondly, changes in Thai law that came into effect in 1996 meant that
parents could be prosecuted if they allowed or encouraged their children to
work as prostitutes.87 Given the emphasis that the children placed on family
relationships and filial obligations, such laws would have made it extremely
difficult for the children to have asked for help, even if they recognized that
they needed it. Keeping the family together was their primary justification
for what they did; the prosecution and imprisonment of their parents was
their worst fear. As suggested previously, initiatives to end child
prostitution need to work with parents and ensure, as far as possible, that
families stay together. Few children would go to the police or welfare
authorities if they believed that their parents could be prosecuted.
Furthermore, such a law gave the state immunity by privatizing the issue
and laying the blame at the feet of the family, whereas wider social,
cultural, and economic factors were also crucially important.
What all child prostitutes need are sympathetic interventions which take
account of their individual circumstances, their own values and, if
appropriate, enable them to stay with their parents. What are not helpful are punitive sanctions against the adults they love most. It needs to be
acknowledged that not all child prostitutes in Thailand (or, indeed,
elsewhere) have been trafficked or debt-bonded, and many will one day
leave prostitution. Policies need to be formulated to help these children now
as they make the transitions out of prostitution.
While a good body of ethnographic evidence about the lives of young
prostitutes in Thailand has now been built up, the findings of such studies
have not always filtered down to NGOs and the wider public. Trafficking
and prostitution continue to be thought of as interchangeable, which can
lead to unhelpful interventions which are, at best, futile; and, at worst,
damaging to the very children they are designed to help. There is still not
enough of an understanding of the different types of prostitution, its links
(or lack thereof) to trafficking, the clients of these children, the different
interventions needed, or the scale of the problem. Future research needs to
take the children's own views as a starting point and promote appropriate
interventions on this basis. Children need to be partners in this process,
consulted and involved at every stage. Their strength and resilience needs to
be acknowledged, and processes must be put in place so that children can
access help without risk to their parents.
Trafficking and prostitution will always remain emotive issues, especially
when they concern children. As more cases are revealed, there will always
be outrage and calls for more to be done to combat the problem. Legal
solutions are a useful starting point, but they can also be blunt instruments
in need of constant and sympathetic enforcement. Certainly, national and
international NGOs-backed by international law-have the very best of
intentions, but without a full understanding of the problems on the ground,
their proposed solutions can exacerbate the problem and alienate the very
children they most want to help. |