IV. AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF CHILD PROSTITUTION IN BAAN
NUA
The complex nature of child prostitution in Thailand became apparent
when I undertook ethnographic fieldwork between 1993 and 1994 in a small
slum community, which I have called Baan Nua. Situated on the edge of a
larger tourist resort in Thailand, Baan Nua was a poor community that
survived through the prostitution of its children. The children's clients were
exclusively Western, and the children's parents were not only well aware of
their conduct, but even encouraged it. Approximately 150 people lived in
Baan Nua, including sixty-five children, around thirty-five of whom worked
as prostitutes. My research focused on boys and girls between the ages of
six and fourteen. I spent fifteen months doing this research, interviewing the
children, gathering life histories, and acting as a participant observer in their
lives.66
Given the community's extreme poverty and lack of resources, a culture
of need led these children into prostitution. The people of Baan Nua had
migrated to this resort approximately fifteen years earlier to look for work
in the informal economy and had put up makeshift houses of scrap wood
and corrugated iron. It was a poor community without running water and
only intermittent electricity, which the inhabitants patched into illegally
from the supply of a local supermarket. The number of households fluctuated throughout the year as partners changed, children moved out, or
the makeshift houses collapsed.
One of the most striking facts about the children in Baan Nua was that
they lived with their parents. In contrast to the image presented in the
media, the children had not been trafficked, debt bonded, or tricked. The
children were therefore technically "free" and able to exercise a certain
amount of control over their clients. There was no formal organization for
prostitution in Baan Nua. Children entered the trade through the
encouragement of friends or older siblings who introduced them to clients,
showed them what acts they had to perform, and looked after them
afterwards. The clients of these children were from several European
countries with three men in particular (from Spain, the United Kingdom,
and Italy) having the most contact with the children. Generally, the children
stayed in the village and lived with their families, but sometimes they
stayed overnight with clients. In a few cases, the older children (those over
fourteen) stayed for a period of a month or two with visiting men but
frequently returned to the village during the day if they were not needed by
their clients.
A. Viewing Paid Sex and its Income as a Familial Obligation
Within Baan Nua, as in much of rural Thailand, children were seen as a
parental investment with an anticipated return, and they were expected to
work for the family as soon as they were able. This emphasis on filial duty
has been a constant theme in ethnographic and other studies of prostitution
in Thailand. As mentioned previously, Muecke argues that while girls in the
past would have earned money through market trading, contemporary
young women are likely to earn money through prostitution.67 Economist
Pasuk Phongpaichit made a similar point in an early study of young
prostitutes in Thailand. She argued that daughters who left their rural homes
to work as prostitutes had not run away, had not been coerced into
prostitution, and had not discarded the principles of support and repayment. These women and girls were fulfilling their obligations as best they could in
a changed environment by earning money elsewhere and sending home the
remittances.68
Concepts of gratitude and obedience towards parents remained important
cultural reference points. Whenever I asked the children in Baan Nua about
prostitution, they almost always referred to these concepts. I was constantly
told that prostitution was a means to an end, a way of fulfilling the filial
obligations that the children felt were demanded of them by their families.
Despite the stigma against prostitution, a powerful mitigating circumstance
for many of them was the financial support they provided for their parents,
particularly their mothers.69
This is not to argue that child prostitution is an intrinsic part of Thai
culture or that it is not abusive, but these responses do suggest that the
children's view of prostitution should be understood through the cultural
reference points of duty and obligation. From the observations I made of
these children, it was clear that they had profoundly different
understandings of sex than Western observers. For these children, neither
prostitution nor sexuality were the focus of their identity, which was based
instead on belonging to a society and fulfilling obligations to their family
and the community. The children felt that by earning money for their
parents and keeping the family together, they were acting in socially
sanctioned roles as dutiful daughters and sons. Prostituting themselves with
the "right" intentions meant that there was little opprobrium on what they
did. While outsiders might label prostitution with foreign clients as abusive,
exploitative, and a form of trafficking, in the children's view, selling sex
was about social relationships and fulfilling their filial obligations to their
families.70
However misguided the children might have been, and however little
they understood the wider political, social, and economic contrast of their
situation, they remained adamant throughout the interviews I conducted
with them that they were agents who could exercise some sort of choice. The children had strategies for rationalizing prostitution and for coming to
terms with it. They consistently refused to admit to prostitution, rejecting
the term when I used it, calling it an ugly thing that had no meaning in their
lives. In their terms, it was only children in brothels who could be called
prostitutes. The children also continually emphasized that they did not "sell
sex," but rather they went "out for fun with foreigners" or had "guests."
Furthermore, these children had an ethical system whereby the public
selling of their bodies did not affect their private sense of humanity and
identity. When I asked one thirteen-year-old about selling her body, she
replied, "it's only my body." She could make a clear conceptual difference
between her body and what she perceived to be her innermost "self' and her
personal sense of identity and morality. When I asked her about the
difference between adultery and prostitution, she told me that adultery was
very wrong. In her eyes, adultery was a betrayal of a private relationship,
whereas prostitution was simply done for money. Betraying family
members, failing to provide for parents, or cheating on spouses or
boyfriends were roundly condemned, but exchanging sex for moneyespecially
when that money was used for moral ends-was not
blameworthy nor did it violate any ethical codes. Furthermore, ideas about
sexual abuse played limited parts in these children's understandings of what
they did.
My study also showed very different understandings about both the shortand
long-term effects of sex on these children. In Western psychological
terms, such acts would be seen as causing life-long damage, but sex was
understood very differently in this context. When a mother was asked about
whether or not she was worried that her eight-year-old son was a prostitute,
she replied, "It's just for one hour. What harm can happen to him in one
hour?" The reality that a child's body is too small for penetration by an
adult was ignored, despite evidence of harm done by these men seen in the
bleeding and tearing that occurred during these encounters.71 Mothers
would condemn such acts and do whatever they could to help their children overcome the pain, but these mothers still claimed not to see it as
fundamentally harmful to their children in the long-term or damaging to
their mental health. Such occurrences were viewed entirely in physicalrather
than psychological-terms, and there was no belief that long-term
damage could be inflicted on a child in "just one hour." |
66 For a full discussion of methods and ethical dilemmas, see Heather Montgomery,
Working with Child Prostitutes in Thailand: Problems of Practice and Interpretation 14
in CHILDHOOD 415 (2007). I carried out this research as part of a doctorate in social
anthropology between 1994 and 1995. Although many anthropologists use the
ethnographic present when discussing their research, I have used the past tense to
describe the situation that I worked in. Shortly after I finished the research, the
community disbanded, and the inhabitants of Baan Nua migrated to other parts of
Thailand. For this reason, the use of the past tense seems most apt.
67 Muecke, supra note 39, at 897.
68 See generally PASUK PHONGPAICHIT, FROM PEASANT GIRLS TO BANGKOK
MASSEUSES (1982).
69 Such a view is not uncommon, and other studies with both adults and children have
shown that how a person spends their earnings can help mitigate the stigma of sex work.
For a vivid example of this see PATTY KELLY, LYDIA'S OPEN DOOR: INSIDE MEXICO'S
MOST MODERN BROTHEL (2008).
70 MONTGOMERY, supra note 25, at 82-84.
71 Brian M Willis & Barry S Levy, Child Prostitution: Global Health Burden, Research
Needs, and Interventions, 359 THE LANCET 1417 (2002), available at
http://www.popcenter.org/problems/trafficked women/PDFs/Willis&Levy_2002.pdf. |