As this quote suggests, trafficking is something done to women and
children, whereas it is something done complicitly by men. Men can
choose; women and children cannot. In reality, of course, men may find
themselves tricked into migration and become just as exploited-finding
their labor conditions just as intolerable.9
Other activists and academics10 have challenged the paradigm of
trafficking and prostitution on other grounds. Their criticisms rest on a
number of issues. First, while trafficking for prostitution is seen as the most
widespread form of trafficking, in reality, it may not be so.11 Because so
many reports of trafficking are based-these academics argue-on
simplistic, sensationalistic stories and unsubstantiated numbers, the extent
and nature of the problem remains unclear.12 Furthermore, this simplistic
schema can be actively damaging as it hijacks "attention away from
structural, underlying causes that give rise to exploitation, structural
violence, and the coercion of (migrant) workers."13
Second, trafficking has become highly gendered and sexualized so that
while the term should neutrally cover all forms of forced migration, it has,
in reality, become unhealthily focused on just one aspec - he sexual
exploitation, victimization, and degradation of women and girls.
Third, this model of trafficking almost always locates trafficked women
and girls in the sex industry and brothels of red light districts. While this
makes it easier to raid such places and "rescue" the victims, it ignores the reality that not all girls and women are trafficked into the sex industry, and
not all women who work in the sex industry do so in brothels. Indeed, many
may work casually on the streets or in rented apartments, while others may
be forced into completely nonsexual kinds of labor.14
Fourth, other criticisms of conflating trafficking and prostitution are
based on the way that this model is not just sexualized, but also racialized,
appealing to racist and nationalist sentiments which can be used to justify
and enforce laws against illegal migration. As a result, this model may
actually victimize those who have migrated illegally more severely as their "rescue" may involve being deported and returned home to where the
factors that drove them out-global inequalities, war, and poverty-have
not improved. In such situations, victims are vulnerable once more to illegal
forms of migration.
Fifth, the question of consent and the extent to which women and even
children can make any sort of informed decisions is missing from many
accounts of trafficking. It is inconceivable to many activists that some
women may choose to migrate illegally, even when they know the dangers,
or make bad decisions and end up in a worse situation than they expected.
Yet, as several authors have pointed out, many trafficked women do not see
themselves as having been forcibly trafficked or tricked against their will
into migration, and they do not identify with the label of victim.15 These
women migrate with an awareness of the risks involved but also with an
understanding of the opportunities. Even if their situations turn out to be
much worse than they had imagined, these women and children still do not
relate to the stereotyped representation of themselves as trafficking victims,
forced against their will into prostitution.
Finally, critics of the Protocol argue that its definition confuses the
morality and criminality of trafficking with that of all forms of prostitution,
understanding sex work as invariably wrong and exploitative-a stance that
many sex-worker advocacy groups reject.16
C. Children and Trafficking
While the debates between abolitionists and those who argue for different
perspectives on sex work and trafficking have generated a great deal of
attention in relation to adult trafficking, there have been no such
deliberations when it comes to children.17 Under international law, the
trafficking of children does not need to involve coercion or force. Any
person under the age of eighteen involved in prostitution or other illegal
activities is trafficked, regardless of consent or the tactics used in
recruitment.18 Such safeguards were included to protect children and to
support other international legislation such as the UN Convention on the
Rights of the Child (UNCRC).19
However, these safeguards allow for no possibility that children are
capable of making active decisions about prostitution or migration.20 This is
not to suggest that children have the right to choose prostitution, that it does
not damage them, or that they should not be protected by every legal means
possible. Yet, child trafficking, even more so than adult trafficking, has
come to be seen almost entirely in the context of sexual exploitation. So
much so that CATW has asserted: "Children are trafficked for forced labor,
domestic work, as child soldiers, and as camel jockeys, but most children
are trafficked for sexual exploitation. And girls trafficked for forced labor
and domestic work often end up sexually exploited by their employers."21
Although it certainly is not the express intent of such a quote, it does imply
a hierarchy of abuse in which sexual exploitation is the worst possible form.
Such a view minimizes other forms of suffering, focuses on the sexual
exploitation of children, and ignores the real tragedies faced by other
children doing dangerous work.
III. CHILD TRAFFICKING AND PROSTITUTION IN THAILAND
A. Early Roots
Thailand has a long history of being linked with prostitution and
trafficking; while the country's problems are not necessarily the most acute,
it is often perceived as having particularly severe problems. As early as the
1920s, the League of Nations was investigating accounts of international
involvement in the Thai sex industry.22 In 1933, the League of Nations
published a report on the trafficking of women and children in the East,23
claiming that Thai, Chinese, and Russian women were selling sex in Thai
brothels, and 40 percent of these women were under the age of twenty.
Although fears about women trafficked as prostitutes and "mail-order
brides" continued to surface in the 1970s,24 anxiety over child trafficking
began to receive particular attention in the 1990s when the issue of the
commercial sexual exploitation of children became a major international
concern.25
B. Public and Media Coverage in the 1990s
In the 1990s, campaigns by the media and nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) claimed that thousands of Western men were
traveling overseas in order to have sex with children. Lurid stories appeared
in national and international newspapers with headlines such as "Disneyland for pedophiles," "Pedophiles find paradise on a white beach in
Thailand," or "Voyage to a life of shattered dreams."26 These articles would
usually tell the heart-wrenching stories of a Southeast Asian girl who was
either cruelly duped or sold by her impoverished and greedy parents into a
life of prostitution. She would be taken to a brothel, forced to have sex with
up to twenty clients a night, usually foreigners, and then be rescued by a
charity or journalist, only to discover that she was HIV-positive and had a
limited time to live.27
One story, titled, "The Littlest Prostitutes," is typical of many that
appeared in the early 1990s:
Nit, a peasant girl from the north, was sold for the price of a
television. In the Bangkok shelter where we met, she sat politely
on the edge of a sofa, fidgeting with her hair. At 13, she still
looked small and guileless enough to play with dolls. And she
talked only in whispers. Five months ago, an agent paid her father
8,000 baht (about $320). The agent, a soldier, told her she would
wash dishes; instead, he took her to a house with 15 other girls. |
9 For accounts of these conditions, see generally Kevin Bales, DISPOSABLE PEOPLE: NEW
SLAVERY IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY (2004) and Christien van den Anker, THE
POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SLAVERY (2004).
10 Sanghera, supra note 1, at 11; Anderson, supra note 5, at 7.
11 ANDERSON, supra note 5, at 7.
12 In particular, see Sanghera, supra note I at 11.
13 ANDERSON, supra note 5; Kempadoo, supra note 8, at vii-xxxiv; Sanghera, supra
note 1, at 3.
14 Kempadoo, supra note 8; Sanghera, supra note 1.
15 Elaine Pearson, HUMAN TRAFFIC, HUMAN RIGHTS: REDEFINING VICTIM
PROTECTION, (2002); Ditmore, supra note 7; Siripom Skrobanek, Nattaya Janthakeero
and Chutima Boonpakdi, THE TRAFFIC IN WOMEN: HUMAN REALITIES OF THE
INTERNATIONAL SEX TRADE (1997).
16 KEMPADOO, supra note 8, at ix.
17 For a notable exception see Sanghera, supra note 1, at 11.
18 Kinsey Alden Dinan, United Nations Trafficking Protocol, in ENCYCLOPEDIA OF
PROSTITUTION AND SEX WORK 512, 512-13 (Melissa Hope Ditmore ed., 2006).
19 Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3 (1989) [hereinafter UNCRC].
Article 34, for example, forbids anyone under the age of eighteen from becoming
involved in any form of prostitution or pornography.
20 Sanghera, supra note 1.
21 Coalition Against Trafficking of Women, Child Trafficking, http://www.catwinternational.org/child-trafficking.php (last visited Aug. 9, 2010).
22 Reports presented by the Comm. of Enquiry into Traffic in Women and Children in the
East, League of Nations Doc. C.849.M.393.1932.IV, 312 (1932).
23 Id.
24 Kempadoo, supra note 8, at xi.
25 HEATHER MONTGOMERY, MODERN BABYLON? PROSTITUTING CHILDREN IN
THAILAND (2001).
26 Ryan Bishop & Lillian S. Robinson, NIGHT MARKET: SEXUAL CULTURES AND THE
THAI ECONOMIC MIRACLE (1998); MONTGOMERY, supra note 25.
27 For examples on the similarities between these stories and those told one hundred
years earlier during the white slavery panics of the 1880s, see Jo Doezema, Loose Women
or Lost Women? The Re-emergence of the Myth of White Slavery in Contemporary
Discourses of Trafficking in Women, 18 GENDER ISSUES 23, 23 (2000). |