Thailand Law Journal 2014 Spring Issue 1 Volume 17

Copyright exceptions for research, study and libraries in Thailand: What should be developed and reformed in order to improve the copyright protection regime?

By Dr. Noppanun Supasiripongchai *

Introduction

Copyright exceptions are one of the problematic areas in the Thai Copyright Act 1994 (henceforth Thai CA 1994) because many provisions in this area are unclear and uncertain. The exceptions to an infringement of copyright are regulated in sections 32 to 43 of the Thai CA 1994. These copyright exceptions can be classified into three categories. The first category is the general conditions or the two pre-conditions in section 32 paragraph 1, which provides that an act against a copyright work of another person which does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the copyright work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate right of the owner of copyright shall not be deemed an infringement of copyright. The second category is the exceptions in the list of permitted acts in section 32 paragraph 2, which consists of eight permitted purposes or uses that can be applied to all types of works: exceptions for research and study; private use; criticism and review; reporting current events; use in judicial or administrative proceedings; reproduction by teachers for instruction purposes; reproduction by educational institutions1 ; and use in assignments or examinations. The third category is the specific exceptions in sections 33 to 43, which can only apply to specific types of use or certain purposes: exceptions for use as reference; for use by librarians; for use of a computer program; for use of dramatic and musical works; for use of artistic works; for use of architectural works; for use of cinematographic work; and for government use.

However, this Article will not consider all copyright exceptions but only those relating to research, study, library and education. Thus, the scope of the Article will be limited to the following exceptions: First, the general conditions or two preconditions in section 32 paragraph 1; Second, four exceptions from the list of permitted acts in section 32 paragraph 2 which are: exceptions for research and study in paragraph 2(1), for teaching purpose in paragraph 2(6), for reproduction by educational institution in paragraph 2(7)2 , for use in assignment or examination in paragraph 2(8). Third, two specific exceptions which are related to education are the exceptions for use as reference in section 33 and exceptions for library use in section 34. The main objects of this Article are: 1) To identify the problems with the educational exceptions under the Thai CA 1994 and demonstrate that these exceptions need to be developed; 2) To suggest and recommend about what should be changed and developed in order to solve the problems and achieve better protection for copyright owners in the Thai education sector. 

The situation of copyright infringement in the Thai education sector which results from inappropriate educational exceptions in the CA 1994 does not seem to improve in the past decade.3 This problem was acknowledged in several reports of the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) of the US. It is necessary to mention the IIPA because the IIPA works with the US Trade Representative (USTR) and other US government agencies in formulating the annual Special 301 reports on whether acts, policies or practices

of any foreign country deny adequate and effective protection of copyright.4 These reports of the IIPA analyzed legal and enforcement deficiencies and highlighted the problems and recommended corrective actions in 48 countries including Thailand. Since the number of copyright infringements in Thailand seems to grow rapidly5 , the IIPA has reported the situation of copyright infringement in Thailand to the USTR every year from 2001 until now through 'the annual Special 301 reviews on copyright protection and enforcement in Thailand', which can lead to the sanction or the removal of the Generalized System of Preference (GSP) that affords duty-free entry to many imported goods from Thailand.
Further, the IIPA also worked with the US government on the IPR provisions of all the recent FTA Agreements6 , including IPR chapters that contain significant obligations about copyright protection.7 This means that the IIPA has an important role not only in formulating the annual Special 301 reports for the USTR but also in creating the copyright provisions in the US FTAs, including the prospective Thailand-US FTA.8 Hence, the problems about the copyright exceptions in Thailand which are acknowledged in the IIPA are relevant for this article to take into consideration.   

The IIPA highlighted that the problem of multiple reproductions and photocopying of entire textbooks in Thailand is centred around commercial copy shops near schools or university campuses which offer photocopy services for the students who order the shop to make copies of entire books or copy chapter-by-chapter routinely.9 Research conducted by the US publishing industry illustrates the severity of this problem in Thailand. For instance, an investigator from the publishing industry who visited a copy shop inside the Medical Faculty of the Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok found a list of fourteen popular medical

books complete with prices of each available for made-to-order sale in photocopied form.10 Interestingly, the statistic indicates that around 60% of all students obtain illegally photocopied versions of the textbooks for schools and universities from commercial copy shops just like the shop at the Chulalongkorn University.11 The university campuses where photocopying of the entire textbooks seems to be particularly prevalent include Chulalongkorn University, Assumption University, Sripatum University, and Mahanakorn University.12  

These photocopying activities not only hurt the publishers of professional and academic textbooks in Thailand severely but also harm the market for US published materials in the country.13 The DIP indicated that most copyright violations in the education sector take place during the beginning of an academic year.14 Importantly, the statistic illustrated that around 60% of students in Bangkok copy entire books and if these students were to buy the average number of books per year (estimated to be between 10-15 books), it would result to around 180,000-270,000 displaced sales to students.15 Thus, the publishing industry lost around 180,000-270,000 genuine book sales per annum in Bangkok alone due to this problem. This numbers do not include the copying carried out by teachers. The US is especially concerned about this problem because many textbooks from US publishers have been reproduced in the form of photocopies of textbooks around schools and university campus in Thailand.16 The IIPA indicated that the numbers of copyright infringement in the Thai education sector remained quite high and were generally above average for the Asia region.17

[1]  [2]  [3]  [4]  [5]  [6]  [7]  [8] [9]  [10]  [11]  [12]  [13] [14]  [15]

1 Supasiripongchai, N, 'Copyright Exceptions and Digital Technology in Educational Institutions in Thailand' (2013), Volume 44, Number 7, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC) 765, at 765-789. The final publication is available on springer's website at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40319-013-0105-7 [Accessed February 20, 2014]

2 Supasiripongchai, N, 'The Enforcement of the Copyright law in Thailand: What could be the answer to massive copyright violations in Thailand?' (2011), Volume 33, Issue 12 European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) 795, at 795-805.

3 Supasiripongchai, N, 'Copyright Exceptions and Digital Technology in Educational Institutions in Thailand' (2013), Volume 44, Number 7, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC) 765, at 765-789. The final publication is available on springer's website at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40319-013-0105-7 [Accessed February 20, 2014]

4 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'IIPA Fact Sheet' (2009), accessible at http://www.iipa.com/pdf/IIPAFactSheet091609.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014]. See also International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2014 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2014/2014SPEC301THAILAND.PDF [Accessed February 20, 2014].

5 Supasiripongchai, N, 'The Enforcement of the Copyright law in Thailand: What could be the answer to massive copyright violations in Thailand?' (2011), Volume 33, Issue 12 European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) 795, at 795-805.

6 Supasiripongchai, N, 'The development of the provisions on the protection of Technological Protection Measures (TPMs) in the light of the prospective Thailand-United States Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and its possible impacts on non-infringing uses under copyright exceptions in Thailand: What should be the solution for Thailand?' (2013), Issue 1 Computer and Telecommunications Law Review (CTLR) 21, at 21- 43.

7 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'IIPA Fact Sheet' (2009), accessible at http://www.iipa.com/pdf/IIPAFactSheet091609.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014].  

8 Supasiripongchai, N, 'The development of the provisions on the protection of Technological Protection Measures (TPMs) in the light of the prospective Thailand-United States Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and its possible impacts on non-infringing uses under copyright exceptions in Thailand: What should be the solution for Thailand?' (2013), Issue 1 Computer and Telecommunications Law Review (CTLR) 21, at 21- 43.

9 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'Request (a joint petition) of Association of American Publishers (AAP), the American Film Marketing Association (AFMA), Interactive Digital Software Association (IDSA), Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), National Music Publishers' Association (NMPA), and Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) for review of the Intellectual Property Practices of Thailand in the 2001 Annual GSP Country Eligibility Practices Review', 66 Fed. Reg. 19278 (2001), accessible at http://www.iipa.com/gsp/2001_Jun17_GSP_Thailand-rev2.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014].

10 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2005 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2005/2005SPEC301THAILAND.pdf[Accessed February 20, 2014]. See also International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2013 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2013/2013SPEC301THAILAND.PDF [Accessed February 20, 2014].

11 Ibid.    

12 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2007 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2007/2007SPEC301THAILAND.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014].See also  International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2014 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2014/2014SPEC301THAILAND.PDF [Accessed February 20, 2014].

13 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2004 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2004/2004SPEC301THAILAND.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014]. See also International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2012 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2012/2012SPEC301THAILAND.PDF [Accessed February 20, 2014].

14 The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) Thailand, 'Thailand's Implementation on Intellectual Property Rights' (May-October 2007), accessible at http://oca.thaiembdc.org/webpages/IP_Laws/FTA301_report01_may2007oct2007.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014]; See also The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) Thailand, 'Thailand's Implementation on Intellectual Property Rights' (March 2009-February 2010), accessible at http://www.ipthailand.go.th/ipthailand/images/Edittt/inter/report-301_feb2010.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014].

15 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2006 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2006/2006SPEC301THAILAND.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014]. See also International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2013 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2013/2013SPEC301THAILAND.PDF [Accessed February 20, 2014].

16 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2004 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2004/2004SPEC301THAILAND.pdf [Accessed February 20, 2014]. See also International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2012 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2012/2012SPEC301THAILAND.PDF [Accessed February 20, 2014].

17 International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 'International intellectual property alliance 2009 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement in Thailand', accessible at http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2009/2009SPEC301THAILAND.pdf[Accessed February 20, 2014]. See also Supasiripongchai, N, 'The Enforcement of the Copyright law in Thailand: What could be the answer to massive copyright violations in Thailand?' (2011), Volume 33, Issue 12 European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) 795, at 795-805.

 



 

© Copyright Thailand Law Forum, All Rights Reserved
(except where the work is the individual works of the authors as noted)