MERCY AND EXTRADITION:
The report indicates that there can be a plea for
mercy even to those whose offence can be grossly immoral in the sight
of the public. There is nothing which can justify child pornography,
child abuse, and one can find little moral justification even fo adult
pornography. Both from the report and the indictment it was not clear
how grave was the fact of child abuse confessed by the offender. In
any case, there can be several points which can mitigate the moral guilt
of the offender, and therefore influence the severity of criminal condemnation
and sentence.
First of all, before passing a condemnation judgement
on Rosser, one has to take into account the present state of pornography
in which the crime of Rosser took place. Pornographic materials are
easily accessed through the Internet, TV, and the press. Many movies
and journals contain what is called ‘soft pornography’,
which can be seen by many as rather attractive, and not as disgusting
as so called ‘hard pornography’. We live in the world where
people can be very vulnerable and easily addicted to pornography. Whatever
is the case, the fact is that the addiction to pornographic materials
becomes a common thing in the age of information technology. There are
reports that people addicted to child pornography went first through
the addiction to adult pornography, after finding it not exciting any
more, turned to more base forms of it.
We need to understand the context of the crime committed
by Rosser, and this context is that he lives in the world filled with
pornographic materials, and he is not, if at all, the only one who has
to be blamed for it. The US government turning their blind eye on many
forms of adult pornography can be seen as contributing to the crime
committed by Rosser. It is reported that the US was at the time of the
offence and perhaps is still the biggest producer of pornographic materials(19).
One cannot win the fight against child pornography without suppressing
adult pornography. The easiness of the access to the filthy materials
is a mitigating circumstance in the case of Rosser. When there are many,
who not only enjoy freedom, but also reap fortunes from pornography
business without much hindrance defiling the moral life and integrity
of millions of people, imposing a severe legal sanction on one of their
victim is in itself an immoral thing.
(19)Lloyd I. Information Technology Law. –
Butterworths, 2000 – P. 274.