Money
Laundering
Written
for the ICC’s Standing Committee on Extortion and Bribery
“Corporate Practices Manual on Extortion and Bribery”
by
David Lyman, Senior Partner
Tilleke & Gibbins
Rev. February 17, 1999
Why
does a Manual on Corporate Practices for businesses devote a chapter to
“Money Laundering”?
Other
chapters of this Manual deal with extortion and bribery and how to curtail
corruption in public-private and private-private transactions. This chapter
addresses how the ill-gotten monies therefrom are disposed of, if not
spent promptly. It is called "money laundering". By common usage and statutory
definition, money laundering is a crime. Perforce, an examination of money
laundering extends beyond extortion and bribery into the realms of narcotics
trafficking, frauds, tax evasion and other serious crimes, domestic and
transnational.
Should
the reader care? Yes. For openers, any business, whether a financial institution,
professional service, industrial enterprise, charitable NGO or otherwise,
caught in the web of money laundering could have its reputation irreparably
damaged. Its directors, management and staff could be the subjects of
private and public investigations out of which indictments and prosecutions
could arise. At best, it would be a public relations nightmare. It only
takes one unethical person who has the discretion to make decisions to
jeopardize an entire organization. A reputation for integrity takes many
years to build, and only a few moments to damage, debase, decimate or
destroy.
Virtually
all businesses would be wise to be alert to money laundering methods and
tactics. For their own protection and preservation, businesses must build
and implement defenses and countermeasures, and install various other
forms of protection.
While
anti-money laundering laws have been or are being adopted in over 100
countries around the world, no country yet requires its financial institutions
to detect money laundering. Pragmatically, the most they can do is to
require that “suspicious transactions” (hard to define) be reported, subject
to a plethora of regulations and policies. Despite the pressing need,
which is slowly being recognized by nation states, the effectiveness of
anti-money laundering laws has been mixed, i.e. better than no laws at
all, but falling far short of the ideal of strict, fair and universal
enforcement with well-knit international cooperation within and between
governments, regulatory and supervisory authorities, law enforcement agencies,
the judiciary and ever the private sector. As usual, vigorous enforcement
is limited to too few countries.
What exactly is
money laundering?
The
phrase is descriptive. In its simplest non-legal terms, money laundering
is “the processing of criminal proceeds (profits or other benefits) in
order to disguise their illegal origin” (FATF). Another definition is
“the process of transforming the proceeds of illegal activities into legitimate
capital” (Mr. Byung-Ki Lee—Korea Institute of Criminology). Note that
the act of money laundering occurs only after a predicate criminal offense
has been committed to generate the criminal proceeds which in turn need
to be laundered to convert them into “legitimate capital”. This transition
process has become a thriving business, albeit quite illegal in some,
but not yet all, countries.
Note
that if the money being moved did not come from an illegal activity, then
its handling and processing are not considered money laundering. Thus,
preparatory measures are not necessarily illegal within the money laundering
context, e.g. pre-positioning funds to be used for, say, bribing a foreign
government official.
Money
laundering has three aspects. The first is physical disposal of the cash,
i.e., its placement. The second is to disguise an audit trail to make
the money, in effect, disappear. The technique is called layering, i.e.,
moving the money around, through and to multiple institutions in different
jurisdictions. The adoption of the Euro as a common currency in Europe
simplifies the flow of funds obviating the complications of shifting between
multiple currencies. The final step is to bring the money back into the
mainstream of commerce and investment as legitimate funds--it is called
integration.
How pervasive
is money laundering?
Money
laundering is said to be the world’s third largest business by value!
And it is growing. How big is it? No one knows with any degree of certainty.
Both experts and competent authorities avoid estimating the scope. That
sidestepping does not help the reader. Let us say evidence points to an
answer of hundreds of billions of US dollars per annum. In early 1995,
the OECD, headquartered in Paris, estimated the scale of laundering of
drug money alone, excluding proceeds of other crimes and tax evasion,
to exceed US$ 1,100 billion annually. The Financial Times of London estimated
this trade value at only US$ 500 billion annually, which sum, nevertheless,
amounts to 2% of global GDP!
In
the FT Fraud Report of October 1997, it was reported that "The Black Economy
in the UK is generally estimated by informed sources to amount to approximately
7% of GDP. In the USA, it is estimated at approximately 9% of GDP; in
Germany, the figure approximates to 10%, while Italy, Greece and Spain
are believed to have black economies amounting to approximately 25% of
their GDPs. In Russia and Central and Eastern Europe, it is anticipated
that the black economy could amount to as much as 50% of GDP." Asia, Africa,
the Middle East and Latin America have their own substantial black economies.
Fraud
often generates money laundering. Businesses are subject to fraud through
simple and complex deceptions by both insiders--employees, agents--and
by outsiders. Being a fraud victim is embarrassing and expensive and recoveries
are limited. On a more widespread scale, of the information age, fraud
can occur through credit cards, smart cards, stored value cards, e-money,
e-commerce, etc. Technology helps both the good and the evil.
Incidentally,
illustrative of how pervasive narcotics have become in our society, it
is said that 90% of the currency bills in circulation in the USA are contaminated
with narcotics. In the UK, the amount is considered as being 40%.
These
estimates dwarf the US$ 11.7 billion anticipated to be gained in the global
trade of counterfeit computer software (BSA and SPA) in 1998. The ICC-Paris
in 1996 estimated that 5-8% of total world trade, say US$ 250 billion,
is in counterfeit products of all types. Much of the monetary proceeds
thereof pass through money laundering schemes.
From
what crimes does money laundering arise—i.e. sources of illegal proceeds?
The
term money laundering is of relatively recent origin. In their modern
context, anti-money laundering precepts and laws were originally only
aimed at the disposing of the proceeds of the trade in narcotics, inclusive
of psychotropic substances. Though hiding money has been around probably
since currency was invented, the US, in 1986, was the first country in
the world to criminalize money laundering but only as it related to the
illegal drug trade. It was soon realized by the US and other countries
that the ill-gotten proceeds of extortion, bribery and fraud also needed
international cooperation legislation to inhibit money laundering, to
track and recover the illegal money, and to prosecute offenders. With
the onset of globalization, instantaneous electronic money transfers,
the growth in the last decade of organized crime and the public disclosure
of scandals, public-private and private-private corruption, and other
serious crimes involving money laundering practices, unfortunately, have
been blossoming.
Besides
narcotics production and trafficking, and depending upon the selection
by each country of which serious crimes to include in their own national
anti-money laundering enactments, there is a vast array of nefarious activities
which generate questionable profits and which are or could be addressed
in anti-money laundering legislation. Examples are extortion, bribes,
protection rackets, terrorism, smuggling of goods (favorites are alcohol,
cigarettes, computer chips and raw materials), smuggling of weapons, nuclear
material, precious metals and precious gems (primary diamonds) to avoid
customs; illegal immigration and smuggling of people to avoid immigration,
white slavery and trafficking in women for prostitution, pedophile activities;
intellectual property (trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets
and know-how); theft and resale of commodities, metals, oil, gas, art,
antiques and historical artifacts; counterfeiting (currency and documents);
crimes of violence (contract killing, arson and bombing); illegal logging
(particularly tropical forests), trade in endangered species of animals
and plants, and even in human body parts; environmental crimes (solid,
toxic and hazardous waste disposal; air, water, noise pollution; unsustainable
development); usury; investment and VAT fraud, false invoicing and financial
fraud (bank fraud, credit card fraud, investment fraud, advance fee fraud,
bankruptcy fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation, insurance fraud, passports,
visas and documentation); motor car thefts, tax fraud, tax evasion; illegal
gambling; maritime crimes (piracy, charter party frauds, cargo deviations,
phantom ships, marine theft, marine pollution); technology crimes; theft
over the Internet, Internet crime generally. While lengthy, this list
is neither exhaustive nor all-inclusive.
Though
the above list is extensive, it bears repeating that each individual country
specifies in statutes those serious crimes which are to be subject to
its money laundering laws. They may be few, or they may be many. The more
crimes covered, the more difficult money laundering should become. Check
the laws of those jurisdictions in which you do business and banking.
Have
there been international endeavors to promote anti-money laundering acceptance?
Anti-money
laundering laws, policies and practices are only recently gaining broad
acceptance among nation states and regional and international organizations.
In 1989, the G-7 countries created the Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”),
an independent intergovernmental agency comprising 26 countries including
the principal major economies, and two regional organizations. The purpose
of this organization is to examine and report on measures to combat money
laundering, to monitor implementations of counter money laundering measures,
to track and review money laundering activities, and to promote FATF activities
and advise members and non-member countries. Its headquarters are located
within the OECD in Paris, France.
In
1990, the FATF issued its Forty Recommendations which “provide a comprehensive
blueprint for action against money laundering, covering the criminal justice
system and law enforcement, the financial system and its regulation; and
international cooperation” (FATF). Amended in 1996 to reflect changes
in money laundering trends and potential future threats, the Forty Recommendations
are the most comprehensive set of anti-money laundering directives yet
created for governments, legislatures, law enforcement, financial institutions
and businesses in general.
Other
international and regional bodies have issued or adopted similar guidelines,
in whole or in part, namely, the United Nations and several of its specialized
agencies, the International Organization of Securities Commissions, the
European Union (EU), the Council of Europe, Gulf Cooperation Council,
Organization of American States (OAS), Caribbean Financial Action Task
Force (CFATF), South Pacific Forum, Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering,
Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific (CSCAP), INTERPOL,
ASEANPOL, World Customs Organization (WCO), Southern and Eastern Africa
Financial Action Task Force (SEAFATF), Bank for International Settlements
(BIS), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International Banking Security
Association, Banking Federation of the European Union, Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), among others. In other words,
with the concepts of good governance, transparency and accountability
being adopted into the work-a-day realms of the public and private sectors,
as demanded by civil society, anti-money laundering policies and practices
are finally gaining the attention of governments and international organizations
throughout the world.
The
bribery of foreign public officials to obtain or maintain business was
criminalized first in 1997 in the US embodied in the now famous "Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act". Twenty years later, the OECD issued its "Convention
on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business
Transactions". In late 1998, this Convention came into force, having been
ratified by the required number of signing countries. Article 7 thereof
criminalizes the money laundering aspect of the predicate offense of bribery.
Article 7, therefore, if enforced, is a key hope in stemming this type
of corruption.
What
are some of the techniques used by money launderers?
The
FAFT annual reports and reports on money laundering typologies are some
of the best sources of information on the subject. (See the FAFT website
at “www.oecd.org/faft/reports.html”.) The aforementioned Forty Recommendations
can also be downloaded from this site. Another source of current information
on money laundering is “Money Laundering Alerts” by Alert Global Media,
a subscription service, which is available at “www.moneylaundering.com”.
Alert Global Media’s list of “Suspicious Activities” examples is instructive
and illuminating.
The
techniques of money laundering can be broken down into three principal
categories: (A) banking, (B) non-bank institutions, and (C) non-financial
businesses. In bullet point form for brevity, the methods are summarized
as:
A. Banking
-
large
deposits and transfers
-
false
name accounts
-
accounts
of friends, relatives and cronies
-
smurfing
(electronic structured transactions of electronic cash)
-
shell
and front companies, usually offshore, for layering transactions
-
lawyers,
accountants, consultants, trustees, fiduciaries
-
“collection
accounts”
-
acquiring
compliant banks
-
“payable
through accounts”
-
“loan
back arrangements”
-
telegraphic
transfer
-
bank
drafts, money orders, cashier’s cheques
-
cash—deposits
and withdrawals, business transactions, smuggling across borders
-
travelers
cheques
-
Internet—banking
and electronic purse accounts
B. Non-Bank Financial
Institutions
-
bureaux
de change, exchange offices, casa de cambio
-
money
remittance services (giro houses)
-
underground
banking—“hawala”, “hundi”, chit and chop shops which handle illegal
foreign exchange transactions in India and East Asia
-
single
premium insurance products
-
postal
services—money orders, packages (for smuggling cash)
C. Non-Financial
Businesses or Professions
-
professional
facilitators, e.g. lawyers, accountants, financial advisors, notaries,
secretarial companies, trustees and other fiduciaries
-
systems
based on trust and loyalty
-
real
businesses—false invoicing, co-mingling of legal and illegal money,
loan back arrangements, layering of transactions through offshore
shell companies, false import/export declarations
-
commercial
trade transactions through Free Trade Zones
-
casinos,
bookmaking, Internet casinos
-
real
estate companies
-
purchase
and cross border delivery of precious metals
-
use
of warrants in the metals market
For
more detailed descriptions of the techniques and how they have worked,
actual case studies can be found in the “Money Laundering Guide” published
in mid-1998 by the Commercial Crime Bureau of the ICC located in Barking,
England, UK. (See their website at: “www.iccwbo.org/icccbhp.htm”. See
also Billy's Money Laundering Information website at "www.laundryman.u-net.com".
Another interesting site is the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network at
"http://www.ustreas.gov/fincen.")
Anti-Money Laundering
Institutions - Deterrence and Countermeasures
There
are several concepts of deterrence which have recently garnered broad
support. Businesses should consider working them into their own normal
accounting and financial control systems. Money laundering can occur innocently
as well as deliberately.
The
first step is to access your own risk profile and vulnerability to being
used for money laundering—check your internal control systems, policies
and operations. Establish internal anti-money laundering policies and
procedures and put senior people in charge of compliance and staff training.
The
fundamental theme common to most of the countermeasure initiatives is
the old maxim of “Know Your Customer” and “Know the Counter Partners”—identify
and verify them through third party due diligence. And maintain files
on them. Know who you are dealing with at both ends of a transaction.
“Know
Your Business” is another vital concept. Protect your integrity and reputation.
Know how, when and where to recognize unusual transactions.
“Know
your Administration”—accurate and complete record-keeping and reporting
compliance is crucial to keep your own business and the anti-money laundering
system functioning. Create audit trails. Audit to test and track your
own anti-money laundering compliance systems.
Recognize
suspicious transactions and transaction sizes and report them to internal
compliance officers and the competent authorities in accordance with anti-money
laundering regulations, laws and policies. Check the suspicious indicators
lists for guidelines.
Educate,
train and periodically test employees to create and maintain their awareness.
Be
forewarned that it is not just corporate reputations which are at risk
for allowing money laundering to occur, but officers, directors and other
individuals involved can face prison terms, substantial fines, and unusual
confiscations. One unscrupulous renegade in an organization can taint
all the honest people in that organization. The costs of reputation repair
and recovery are enormous, far outweighing the costs of precaution.
Conclusions
Money
laundering is BIG business. Should your business inadvertently, directly
or even indirectly, become a victim of or a participant in any serious
crime, the chances are high that your money will disappear through one
or more money laundering ploys. Finding your money and recovering it will
be time consuming and expensive, and for some, most embarrassing. Probably
less than 10% of the victims, corporate and individual, take the effort
to even attempt recovery of lost funds.
Protect
yourself and your integrity with the “Know Your…” concepts. Anti-money
laundering laws have yet to prove their effectiveness, and international
cooperation between governments with respect to money laundering is only
now being established. Such laws, practices and cooperation have to work
if legitimate business is to survive and prosper.
Finally,
for readers who want to learn more about money laundering, please refer
to lists of Internet links on the Web at: “http://macau.ctm.net/jgod/m/html”
and “http://www.ex.ac.uk/RDavies/arian/scandals/launder/html”.
Also periodically check the website of Transparency International, the
coalition against corruption in international business at "http://www.transparency.de".
|