As noted, we do not have a statistically representative sample, given the selection of industries and the endogenous selection associated with the participation of firms in the project--limitations resulting mainly from the project's budgetary constraints. By the same token, however, the dataset has important strengths: it includes detailed current and retrospective information on family background, education, and different types of training.
Table 1 shows the distribution of employment by education and industry in the sample (columns 1-4) and in the total labor force (column 5). Because our sample excludes agricultural employment, where average educational attainment in Thailand is very low, and includes only firms with over 100 employees and a young labor force--and younger cohorts in medium to large firms are more educated than average--the fact that it is more educated than the Thai labor force as a whole is not surprising. [FN7] The differences, however, are arresting. The share of employees with only primary education in our sample, for example, is close to zero in three industries out of four and significantly different from zero only in food processing. In Thailand as a whole, this share is as high as 75%. College graduates are 45% of all employees in the personal computers industry, compared to only 9% of employees across the country as a whole.
Table 1. Distribution of Employees by Education, by Industry, and Overall.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Education Foodstuffs Computer Auto HDD National
Electronics Components Components Average
(OECD)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary 0.40 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.75
Lower 0.19 0.11 0.27 0.26 --
Secondary
Upper 0.24 0.46 0.37 0.36 0.16
Secondary
Tertiary 0.17 0.45 0.32 0.35 0.09
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Lower and upper secondary education are aggregated together in the national average.
Table 2 presents summary statistics for a selection of variables in the survey for the year 2001, separately for men and women. Women outnumbered men in the sample, which partly reflects the already mentioned fact that women hold the majority of jobs in Thai export-oriented firms.
Table 2. Means and Standard Deviations of the Main Variables, by Gender, 2001.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Men Women
------------------------------- ---------------------------
Variable Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Observations 690 1,047
Wage 14,386 (8,237) 9,347 (5,260)
OJT Incidence 0.55 (0.49) 0.67 (0.46)
OFFJT Incidence 0.67 (0.46) 0.58 (0.48)
OJT Intensity 2.62 (6.66) 3.18 (7.49)
OFFJT Intensity 1.57 (3.04) 0.87 (1.56)
Cumulated OJT 8.95 (22.26) 11.63 (25.9)
Cumulated OFFJT 6.07 (12.59) 3.93 (6.49)
Years of Education 12.90 (2.59) 10.67 (3.05)
Age 28.26 (5.34) 28.09 (6.31)
Tenure in 1998 2.58 (3.53) 3.29 (3.72)
Previous Experience 2.17 (3.45) 2.28 (3.72)
in 1998
No. Siblings 3.12 (2.18) 3.36 (2.23)
Father's Education 0.26 0.18
Mother's Education 0.15 0.09
Oldest Sibling's 0.21 0.09
Education
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variable definitions. Wage: nominal monthly wage, in baths. OJT incidence:
|